|
Our
film opens, serenely enough, with a scenic
tour of our titular bay (that
isn't very bloody...yet.) Our tour
then continues through several dilapidated
buildings until we come to the main house,
that of Countess Donati (Isa
Miranda). The main house, itself, is in pretty good
shape, but as the old girl makes her way
through it, by way of her wheelchair, you
get an overwhelming sense of melancholy
from her as she moves from room to room,
object to object. And her
mood isn't going to get any better,
either, as she
enters another room and spies a noose
hanging in the doorway! As the noose is
thrown around her neck, the unseen
assailant then kicks the wheelchair
out from under her and the Countess falls and
strangles under her own weight.
The
dastardly deed done, the camera pans to the killer's feet,
then pans up to the customary black gloves
(that all killers in Italian giallo
are required to wear). But then the
movie throws us the first of many curveballs as it keeps on
panning up, revealing the killer's face (what?
Already?). The revealed killer is the Baron Donati (Giovanni
Nivolletti), the Countess' much younger,
gold-digging husband, who
moves to her desk and drops a note
on it; the note is in Italian, but
considering her earlier mood, it's not too
hard to decipher that this will serve as a [fake]
suicide note. So, the Baron, for some
reason yet to be revealed, murdered his wife and
is making it look like a suicide. Will
he get away with it?
Well,
the
answer to that is an abrupt and brutal "No!" as
another killer lunges out of the darkness
and stabs the Baron, repeatedly, with a
knife. Who killed the Baron? And why did
the Baron kill his wife? We don't know,
yet; but eleven more people will meet
their gruesome demise for those reasons
before the end credits roll...

Mario
Bava, a movie icon if there ever was one,
broke into the movie business as a visual-effects artist, cinematographer, and
production designer. And if not for several
instances of directors quitting on
projects he was assigned to, where he was
pressed into service to finish them -- in
some cases, these directors would quit on
purpose just to get the reluctant and
reclusive Bava into the
director's chair -- the
world might have been denied his brilliant
talents. Producers loved him for his fast
shooting pace and his ability to camouflage
and maximize miniscule budgets with his
camera tricks and production designs --
and especially his uncanny knack for
making every pinched penny shown on screen
look like a $1000.
Over
the years, like most of his Italian contemporaries,
Bava had a hand in all kinds of
genres; off the wall spy-flicks (Diabolik),
westerns (Roy
Colt and Winchester Jack), crime dramas
(Rabid
Dogs),
sword and sandal (Hercules, Hercules
Unchained and the fantastic
Hercules in
the Haunted World),
Teutonic Viking epics (Knives
of the Avenger), science fiction
(Planet of the
Vampires)
-- hell, he even
made a giant monster movie (Caltiki:
The
Immortal Monster
-- Italy's
only giant monster movie I might add --
unless you count Tentacles,
but why would you want to?). Bava's
only real failure was comedy when he
bombed and
bottomed out with Dr.
Goldfoot and the Bikini Bombs. This
cost him a contract with American
International Pictures, meaning no
more international distribution until this
film, and one wonders if this disaster was
by design to free him up to do other
things? I doubt it. It would be almost two years
before Bava would direct again.
Now,
Bava might be best remembered for those
gothic horror shows that AIP imported, and
drastically toned down, with the likes of
Black Sunday and Black Sabbath (--
that
everyone wrongfully assumes are the same
film; the first one is with Barbara Steele,
and the second featured Boris Karloff in
one of his last film roles --),
that
is, he would be best remembered for
them if it weren't for this
particular film we're reviewing today. Before
Bikini Bombs tanked, Bava was putting his own
personal stamp on a new genre that would
come to be known as giallo; violent whodunits that
were short on mystery but long on body
counts, with very lurid titles that would
fit perfectly on the cover of the pulp
'zines they were derived from.
Historically
in cinema, murder was usually a crime of
heated passion, cold revenge, or an act of greed,
but a new
source was edging its way in, usually of a
repressed sexual or psychological
dysfunction;
meaning motives were no longer relevant,
and, more importantly, everyone's a
suspect. They seldom made a lot of sense
until -- like in any old Agatha Christie
novel, where what few clues you are given don't
make any sense and prove basically
irrelevant -- the twelfth hour revelation (in the last chapter or
reel) links it all together and
explains things, for the most part,
satisfactorily. (They just wanna make sure
you have to stick around for the whole
thing) So with most giallo,
patience is a virtue (that can
often be stretched past the point of
critical credulity.)
The
seeds of Bava's visual and instinctive style were planted in
The
Girl Who Knew Too Much,
but they didn't
reach full bloom until Blood and Black
Lace
-- upon whose viewing this particular
critic had the first realization that he
was watching cinema, not just a movie.
His movies were visually stunning, and
were financially successful; which, of
course, bred a rash of imitators. But Bava
continued to make them better, but after
Five Dolls for an August Moon he was
growing tired of the formula, and his own
hype, and wanted to
try something different. Or maybe, just
maybe, he wanted to show all those young Turks
like Argento, Lenzi and Martino that the
Old Man was still the king.
Bay
of Blood began with an idea co-conspired
by Bava and actress Laura Betti while
making Hatchet for a
Honeymoon.
Securing limited financing from producer Giuseppe
Zaccariello, the script went through
several stages and five collaborators
before the cameras rolled; which is
amazing as it seems that Bava's only real
desire, here, is to focus on the murders
themselves. For the plot that strings them
together is totally convoluted, extremely confusing, and
makes Raymond Chandler's The
Big Sleep
read like shampoo instructions.
Don't
believe me? Read on...
Now,
we,
as the audience, know the Baron has been
murdered but his body has mysteriously
disappeared. (However,
that mysterious splashing we heard during
those scenic shots of the bay gives us a
pretty good clue where he is.)
Inside, the other body is discovered; the
police find the note, and are satisfied
that the Countess committed suicide and
figure the Baron's absence, like the many
times he's run off before -- until he needed
money and returned, is what pushed her
over the edge. You
see, the Baron and the Countess were on
the outs; he wanted to develop the prime
piece of real estate around the bay into a
tourist resort, but she was content to just
keep it in the family. (The
Baron had tried this before,
unsuccessfully, and this explains all the
abandoned buildings around the house.)
Furious with this decision, things got
ugly, and she kicked him out. Old and
alone, then, they assume the Countess hung
herself. We
learn most of this through some plot
exposition provided by the Fosattis, Paola
(Leopoldo Triesta) and Anna (Betti), who
rent one of the cabins, and Simon (Claudio
Volante) the groundskeeper, who lives in a
shack down by the docks (and
has a thing for munching raw octopus.)
The
twitchy Paola is an entomologist who spends his days collecting insects around
the bay and sticking needles in them. He's
glad that the Countess decided against
changing things, keeping it all natural
for him and his creepy-crawlies, but he's sorry that she's
dead. Simon,
who is one surly S.O.B., isn't sure if it
was a suicide and thinks the Baron might
have killed her and run off, then
continues to chew on his octopus. Anna,
meanwhile, is mostly concerned with her next drink
and spends most of her time reading her
tarot cards, forecasting doom and
damnation, and
listening in on conversations that really
don't concern her. Through her gift of gab
and gossip, though, she also knows who Simon
really is.
The
plot thickens with the entrance of two
more players: Frank Ventura
(Cristea
Avram -- who
is either some kind of lawyer or real
estate agent) and Laura (Anna
Rosati), his girlfriend/secretary,
who finish up doing the horizontal bop; and then he
starts talking about heading to the bay to
get an all important signature as part of
his master plan. Who's signature does he
need? We don't know, and he's not saying.
And fair warning; the movie is
only beginning to be coy with us. Laura wants to go with him, but
is told to
stay put; it shouldn't take long. And then
the
bay starts to get crowded when another couple, Reneta
(Claudia Auger) and Albert (Luigi
Pistili), and their two
young children, arrive in an RV. Seems Reneta is
the Baron's daughter from a previous
marriage and, suspicious of his sudden
disappearance, they've come to try and find
him. After putting the children to
bed, they venture out into the gloom to
see if they can find any clues. Things get
even more crowded, and the plot
starts to curdle a little, when two local
teenage boys, Duke and Bob (Guido
Boccaccini and Roberto Bannani), decide
to take their new girlfriends, Brunhillda
and Denise (Brigitte Skay and Paola
Rubens), to the bay, figuring the
old abandoned resort will be a
great spot to score a little nookie. (Yeah,
you're right, they're not going to last
very long.) Oh,
yeah, before I forget, Laura decides to come, anyway,
later, on her own, making an even
"Ten Little Indians" for our
killer to dispose of.
All
of these characters are drawn into a web
of murder, and after a slow and confusing
build-up,
the killing then comes fast and furious. At
first, we're not sure who the killer is, but as the evening progresses, and the
bodies start piling up, it's revealed that
a deadly conspiracy is behind it all to
take control of the bay and cash in on the
land. And, for the record, there is more than one
killer running amok. There are two
separate factions killing for the land,
eliminating heirs and witnesses. And
just like in Chandler's aforementioned novel,
we're still not sure who the
killer really was in some instances. But it
is kind of neat how the
whole thing unravels and plays out. I
hesitate to spoil it, so I'll give you this
option. Click on the link below to see who
got killed, how, and whodunit. If you don't
want to know, skip it and read on. There
are still a few spoilers ahead in the
text, but they
shouldn't ruin the experience for you.
The
Bay of Blood Index O' Death
Welcome
back.
Are
you still with me? Good.
So,
in the end, everyone is dead.
"That's
not a spoiler?!" you cry incredulously.
No,
not really. Like
I said earlier, I like the way the ending
unravels, how the conspiracy is revealed, and the film's first two climaxes. The
third climax, however, when the movie
should be over but the killers are
mysteriously killed is, forgive me Mr.
Bava, monumentally stupid. There's a ton
of evidence that what we've just witnessed
is one long, though very black, joke; the kamikaze
fly who bites it in the drink; cutaways to
"smiling" cars; and victims
finishing off an orgasm before they
expire. You just get the sense that the
director is winking at you the whole time.
The eccentric Bava had a strangely wicked
sense of humor, and I'm sure it was
amusing at the time, but after that much of
an audience investment it comes off a
little too trite for me -- like a joke or
running gag that has overstayed it's
welcome, has moved beyond droll, and is
barreling toward full-blown annoyance.
I
think most of my frustrations, aside from
that ending, with
Bay of Blood
can be
blamed on the atrocious audio track on
Image Entertainment's DVD; sold
as Twitch
of the Death Nerve
-- part of the Mario Bava Collection.
The
plot is muddled and hard to follow because
the plot is hard to hear. The mix is out
of whack, and it's hard
enough to keep track of what's going on
without the dialogue being drowned out by
the soundtrack.
I spent half the movie under the wrong
assumption that all the characters were
related, making them heirs to be
eliminated but it turns out most of them
weren't; just in the wrong place
at the wrong time, or witnesses that need to
be eliminated.
I
think a lot of this could be cleared
up with either a re-dub or, better still,
use the original Italian track and just
give me some subtitles. (Honestly,
I don't mind reading while watching.)
Is anything like this available? Are there
any better versions out there? My search
came up bupkus.
However,
as I said before, the plot of who covets
the bay the most is a convenience, or
contrivance, to just string the murders
together so the point is probably moot.
And are
these thirteen murders enough to carry the film?
Yeah, they are. They may seem routine
today, but, you've got to have some
perspective here; this one came first. Bava
made a conscious decision not to turn the
camera away after the killer caught up to
his/her victim; the camera lingers until
the violence is done. If you've ever
wondered what a Sam Peckinpah horror movie
would look like? Here you go. Some
of the deaths are shocking like Bob's
machete facial;
others are oddly comical like when the
couple are pinned together with the spear,
they do appear to finish orgasm before they
both expire; while others are an
odd combination of both -- Simon's
death; and if you've seen the film, you'll
know what I'm talking about.
The
gore-effects were provided by Carlos
Rambaldi. Rambaldi went on to do the
special make-up effects for Andy Warhol's Frankenstein and
Dracula, built the
aliens for Alien and
E.T.,
but he will always be remembered, by me
anyways, for his colossal failure to
deliver the promised goods in the Big D's
remake of King
Kong. To his credit,
though, thirty years later, his effects
hold up remarkably well, here. I
especially like the scene when the killer
pulls the cleaver back out of Bob's face
-- and Bob is still blinking!!!
Despite
the shoestring budget and no-frills shoot,
Bava was proud of the film. His
voyeuristic and grisly approach was so
vastly different than his established
style, though, that the film was a
critical disaster. The domestic box office
however...
It
was Steve
Minasian and his Boston based Hallmark
Releasing Corporation that imported Reazione a
catera, as it was known in Italy (translated
it means "chain reaction")
to the States. Renaming it Carnage,
he ballyhooed it with an all day free
preview and ran a full page ad warning
the film was "The real thing -- the
first movie that dares to show hardcore
violence." HRC slapped a
self-imposed rating of "V -- or
Violence" to get everyone's
attention, and
teased the potential audience more by
insisting each ticket holder be required
to receive a "face to face"
warning about what they were going to see
before being admitted into the theater.
This type of promotion had worked well
before on the earlier imported Mark
of the Devil, so Minasian did it again,
bringing the [morbidly] curious public in
in droves. But the
film ran into some legal hassles with the
MPAA over the fake rating and was withdrawn
-- only to be reborn again, under a different
title and ad campaign as Twitch of the
Death Nerve. The lurid title made it a
drive-in hit. Minasian kept it in
circulation, and
kept squeezing dollars out of it by
changing titles and re-releasing it --
twelve
different titles in all, making its last rounds for Hallmark as
Last
House on the Left II in 1977.
Minasian
still wasn't done bilking, though. You see,
HRC was also in the business of financing
a few domestic pictures of its own. One in particular was a film
by a couple of unknowns by the name of Wes
Craven and Sean S. Cunningham. The picture,
obviously, was the original Last House on the
Left,
and Minasian would
back Cunningham's next project, A Long
Night at Camp Blood, too. But you probably
know that one better as Friday the
13th.
To
say Cunningham borrowed some ideas from
Bava's film is an insult, but this kind of
thing has been going on since filmmaking
began; there's a fine line between paying
homage and ripping off, and, frankly, I've
as yet to determine the difference -- so I
usually try to let this kind of stuff
slide.
Carpenter's
Halloween started the blood flowing, so to
speak, but it wasn't until after Friday
the 13th that this type of film
became a
full blown epidemic. Spawning hundreds of
its own imitators, the horror film, as a
genre, has been hemorrhaging out (to
keep the blood references coming)
and suffering the consequences ever since.
Don't get me wrong; I love these types of
movies, but for a span of about fifteen
years that's the only kind of
horror movie that got made. And even after
that, the genre was still having problems
recovering from their hangover and
couldn't seem to establish any kind of
identity beyond them.
Gialli,
Canuxploitation -- Canada produce a
ton of these things in the early '80s, and
probably the ones you remember most like Prom
Night
or My
Bloody Valentine
-- stalk and slash, slasher, or body count movies, call them
what you will, didn't involve a lot of
original thinking. There were rules, and
standards and practices, that were followed
to achieve the producer's goal. No, not
some artistic statement -- profits. Even
the
Weinstein's built their current Miramax
empire with the humble beginnings of The
Burning.
I'm
sure at the time of its production, Bava
had no clue that Bay of Blood would set
the template for such things, but that it
did. Here are a few scenes and traits that
soon became standard:
Slasher
101.
-
All
is well. No worries. Arrrgghh!...
There are a lot of misleading musical
cues, here, to the lull the audience
into a false sense of security; and
then, whammo!, someone gets skewered
by something sharp.
-
Watch
out for the local kooks, spooks, and
red herrings. And ignore their
warnings or prophecies of doom...
There's usually some local weirdoes or
perverts hanging around. The twitchy
Paolo Fosatti and his penchant for
skewering bugs has red herring written
all over him. And while his wife tries to warn
everyone that death is lurking about, no one listens. She doesn't listen,
either, and fails to make it to the
end.
-
Cannon
fodder...
Don't have enough people in your cast
to have a big enough body count? No
problem. Just have a group of teens
that are irrelevant to your
"plot" wander onto your set
on the wrong day and at the wrong time and
they'll never know what hit them.
-
Culling
the herd. Stalk before the slash...
One at a time, people. Divide and
conquer. Separate, then slaughter. No;
you don't have to do anything, your
victims will usually do it for you.
String it out as long as you can, too.
And can you keep losing your top and
tripping while trying to run away from
me? Thanks. Let's see. Nothing around
this corner. Nothing around that
corner. There's probably nothing
around here either...*thwack*.
-
Get
naked and die... Or
have sex and die. Wander off by
yourself and die. Be greedy and die.
Wear the wrong color of socks and die.
-
The
Bloody Money Shot...
It pays to have a good F/X team on
your project. Since your plot stinks
and your characters are cardboard
cutouts, this is your bread and butter
and the reason why people come to see
the movie -- so you'd best make it count.
Each film has multiple murders, but
there is always one or two
spectacularly gruesome sequences that
everyone will still be talking about
come tomorrow. Whether somebody gets
their head lopped off, complete with a
fountain of blood coming out of the
stump, or someone taking a meat-cleaver to
the face, the gorier the merrier.
-
The
body pile...
How they get them moved so fast is
beyond me. And how they hide the smell
is an even bigger mystery, but pray you
don't find it -- unless you're the
final girl -- or you'll soon be on top
of it; if'n you know what I mean.
-
I'm
not quite dead... Characters
that you think are dead keep popping
back up. This super-power would
eventually transfer to the killer, or
be bestowed upon a character the
audience likes who would miraculously
recover from mortal wounds after the
climax (Think
Deputy Dewey in Scream.)
-
Motive?
We don't need no stinkin' motive -- or
plot...
I've touched on this already: all you
need is the barest of threads to
string the murders together as it
became less and less about whodunit
but how they "dunit", how
many they "dunit" to, and
with what sharp object they
"dunit" with.
-
The
twist in the plot -- or -- "Oh, it's just
you...wait. You! You're the
killer"... Here
we have the origin of the final girl.
Yes, I know, Laura doesn't make it but
her confrontation with Simon in the
cabin is stolen, almost verbatim, for
Friday the 13th when Alice realizes
that Mrs. Voorhees isn't quite right
in the head. Hell,
she and Simon are even wearing almost
the exact same sweaters! This
of course leads to...
-
Yes,
I did it -- and now I'm going to tell
you why...
When Simon goes all schizo on Laura
and spews venom at her, fingering her
as one of his mother's murderers, we'd
be seeing a lot of family skeletons
coming out of the closet and psychoses
spewed forth to try and rationalize
and justify all the carnage we've just
witnessed over the last hour and half
for years to come.
-
Oh,
and one more thing before you go... Ah,
the shock ending out of left field.
Affectionately known as the cheesedick
ending around these parts. This would
eventually morph into the killer isn't
really dead, they'll rise one more
time for a scare, or he's still on the
loose when the credits roll --
because
we need 'em for the sequel.
-
And
I'm sure I'm missing more but these
are the most obvious.
Thirty
years after the fact, Bava's initial
vision has been so distilled and watered
down that they've become laughable clichés.
Sure, they may have copied his murders and his
formula, but they can't touch his
distinctive style. Hands down, this guy is
my favorite director of all time. His
films are not meant to be watched, but experienced.
(And even his colossal misfires are
beautiful to look at.) And I'll argue with anyone
that nobody has had a bigger influence on
horror films than this guy. I think he
saved the genre once with Black Sunday,
but also, regrettably, and it's not really his
fault, he went on to devastate the genre, as a
whole, no matter how much you enjoy them,
like I do (and
I can't stress that enough), with
this film and its bastard progeny.
|